VS
Fidelity International Momentum Index ETF (FCIM) and RBC Quant EAFE Dividend Leaders ETF (RID) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FCIM focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Industrials, and Communication Services, while RID leans towards Industrials, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, FCIM features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.49% for RID. Performance-wise, FCIM has returned 15.99% year-to-date with +$461 M in net flows, whereas RID is at 12.04% with +$154 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIM
RID
| AuM | $1,716.41 M | $501.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.49% | 0.54% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.35% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIM | -0.89% | +10.02% | +15.99% | +34.28% | +118.83% |
RID | +1.60% | +8.45% | +12.04% | +32.40% | +85.31% | |
| Flows | FCIM | +$67 M | +$192 M | +$461 M | +$970 M | +$1,332 M |
RID | +$15 M | +$78 M | +$154 M | +$272 M | +$299 M |
FCIM vs RID exposure
Countries
FCIM
Japan
21.87%
Other
19.32%
United Kingdom
13.08%
Australia
7.45%
Other
38.27%
RID
Japan
21.89%
United Kingdom
13.23%
Other
11.90%
France
7.48%
Other
45.50%
Sectors
FCIM
Financials
25.21%
Other
20.40%
Industrials
10.87%
Communication Services
9.84%
Real Estate
9.20%
Utilities
9.01%
Other
15.48%
RID
Industrials
17.28%
Financials
15.73%
Other
12.68%
Consumer Discretionary
8.93%
Health Care
8.88%
Consumer Staples
8.41%
Other
28.10%
As of June 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIM
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP
3.97%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY
3.77%
MITSUBISHI ESTATE
3.40%
SWISS PRIME SITE
3.15%
TELECOM ITALIA
3.10%
ENGIE
2.98%
VODAFONE GROUP
2.77%
HENDERSON
2.65%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.46%
TOKYO GAS
2.26%
RID
ASML HOLDING
3.04%
ING GROEP
2.58%
ROCHE
2.54%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.49%
TELEFONICA SA
2.47%
NATURGY ENERGY GROUP SA
2.43%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
2.35%
ASTELLAS PHARMA
2.29%
WARTSILA
2.22%
IMPERIAL BRANDS PLC
2.18%
Diversification
FCIM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 85 total
30.50%
RID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 99 total
24.59%
Characteristics
Compare
FCIM
RID
| Provider | Fidelity | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.42% | 2.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | January 15, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIM and RID
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIM or RID?
As of June 8, 2026, FCIM has returned 15.99% year to date, while RID has returned 12.04%. FCIM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIM or RID?
As of June 8, 2026, FCIM manages $1.72 B in assets, while RID manages $501.36 M. FCIM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIM and RID managed?
FCIM is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Momentum GTR Index - CAD benchmark. RID is actively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FCIM and RID emphasize?
FCIM is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Communication Services. RID is most exposed to Industrials, Financials, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIM or RID?
Year to date, FCIM has seen +$460.71 M in net flows, compared with +$153.69 M for RID. FCIM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIM and RID compare?
FCIM has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while RID has an expense ratio of 0.54%.
What are the top holdings of FCIM and RID?
FCIM's largest holdings include SOFTBANK GROUP CORP, ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY, and MITSUBISHI ESTATE. RID's top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ING GROEP, and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: FCIM or RID?
FCIM holds 84 securities, while RID holds 99. On holdings count, RID is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FCIM and RID
International ETFs To Reduce U.S. Market Exposure
A look at International Equity ETFs worthy of consideration in a changing global landscape.
Posted on 3/6/2025 by Kyle Anthony inGlobal
Fidelity Investments Canada welcomes 12 ETFs to Cboe Canada
Fidelity Investments Canada increases their ETF offerings on Cboe Canada.
Posted on 4/12/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.