FSL
First Trust Senior Loan ETF (CA)

Full FSL fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, FSL features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FSL has returned 0.24% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 9.49% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%May 5May 12May 20May 27Jun 3

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FSL
-0.26%+0.97%-0.24%+1.80%+17.26%
XIC
+2.69%+2.96%+9.49%+33.72%+87.75%
Flows
FSL
+$0 M+$1 M-$3 M+$4 M+$25 M
XIC
+$363 M+$2,779 M+$5,533 M+$7,652 M+$11,585 M

FSL vs XIC exposure

Countries

FSL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%

Sectors

FSL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FSL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%

Diversification

FSL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%

Characteristics

Compare
FSL
XIC
ProviderFirst TrustiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.04%2.04%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 28, 2013February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about FSL and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FSL or XIC?
As of June 5, 2026, FSL has returned -0.24% year to date, while XIC has returned 9.49%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FSL or XIC?
As of June 5, 2026, FSL manages $57.68 M in assets, while XIC manages $29.65 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FSL and XIC managed?
FSL is actively managed by First Trust. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FSL or XIC?
Year to date, FSL has seen -$3.41 M in net flows, compared with +$5,532.87 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FSL and XIC compare?
FSL has an expense ratio of 1.02%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about FSL and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds