VFV
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

Full VFV fund page
VS
ZAPR
BMO US Equity Buffer Hedged to CAD ETF - April

Full ZAPR fund page

Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) and BMO US Equity Buffer Hedged to CAD ETF - April (ZAPR) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that VFV focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary, while ZAPR leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, VFV features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.73% for ZAPR. Performance-wise, VFV has returned 10.44% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas ZAPR is at 5.77% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 8May 15May 25Jun 1Jun 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
VFV
+2.22%+12.19%+10.44%+26.90%+87.08%
ZAPR
+0.19%+5.06%+5.77%+10.32%-
Flows
VFV
+$667 M+$1,375 M+$2,180 M+$3,978 M+$14,190 M
ZAPR
+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M+$3 M-

VFV vs ZAPR exposure

Countries

VFV
USA
96.62%
ZAPR
USA
101.89%

Sectors

VFV
Information Technology
35.60%
Communication Services
10.96%
Consumer Discretionary
10.09%
Financials
9.73%
Health Care
8.36%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
17.20%
ZAPR
Information Technology
38.22%
Communication Services
11.21%
Consumer Discretionary
10.56%
Financials
10.43%
Health Care
8.67%
Industrials
8.41%
Other
12.49%
As of June 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

VFV
NVIDIA
7.83%
APPLE
6.44%
MICROSOFT-T
4.89%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.62%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.89%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.73%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.40%
ZAPR
NVIDIA
8.74%
APPLE
6.82%
MICROSOFT-T
5.42%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.42%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.50%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.31%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.80%
META PLATFORMS
2.52%
TESLA
1.80%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.51%

Diversification

VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
38.34%
ZAPR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
40.85%

Characteristics

Compare
VFV
ZAPR
ProviderVanguardBMO
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.85%0.46%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 2, 2012March 25, 2024

Frequently asked questions about VFV and ZAPR

Which ETF has performed better year to date: VFV or ZAPR?
As of June 8, 2026, VFV has returned 10.44% year to date, while ZAPR has returned 5.77%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: VFV or ZAPR?
As of June 8, 2026, VFV manages $32.73 B in assets, while ZAPR manages $114.50 M. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are VFV and ZAPR managed?
VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark. ZAPR is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do VFV and ZAPR emphasize?
VFV is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. ZAPR is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: VFV or ZAPR?
Year to date, VFV has seen +$2,179.78 M in net flows, compared with +$1.70 M for ZAPR. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of VFV and ZAPR compare?
VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZAPR has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of VFV and ZAPR?
VFV's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. ZAPR's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: VFV or ZAPR?
VFV holds 478 securities, while ZAPR holds 477. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about VFV and ZAPR

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds