VS
Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs Mackenzie International Equity Index ETF (QDX) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN and QDX provide the same top sector exposures: Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.17% for QDX. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 7.4% year-to-date with +$135 M in net flows, whereas QDX is at 9.62% with +$132 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XIN
QDX
| AuM | $1,866.99 M | $1,618.44 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.17% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.32% | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XIN | +1.62% | +3.61% | +7.40% | +19.68% | +53.02% |
QDX | +3.96% | +6.06% | +9.62% | +22.66% | +63.76% | |
| Flows | XIN | +$12 M | +$20 M | +$135 M | +$193 M | +$94 M |
QDX | +$28 M | +$90 M | +$132 M | +$236 M | +$572 M |
XIN vs QDX exposure
Countries
XIN
Japan
22.83%
United Kingdom
14.35%
Switzerland
9.27%
France
9.08%
Germany
9.00%
Other
35.47%
QDX
Japan
25.13%
United Kingdom
14.01%
Switzerland
8.48%
Germany
8.35%
France
8.07%
Australia
7.29%
Other
28.67%
Sectors
XIN
Financials
23.75%
Industrials
18.74%
Information Technology
9.43%
Consumer Discretionary
8.16%
Health Care
7.38%
Other
32.54%
QDX
Financials
23.38%
Industrials
18.81%
Information Technology
9.82%
Consumer Discretionary
8.51%
Health Care
7.33%
Other
32.15%
As of June 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XIN
ASML HOLDING
2.57%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.45%
ASTRAZENECA
1.36%
CH1499059983
1.32%
NOVARTIS
1.30%
NESTLE SA
1.20%
SHELL PLC
1.19%
SIEMENS
1.04%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.97%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.94%
QDX
ASML HOLDING
2.50%
HSBC HOLDINGS
1.44%
CH1499059983
1.31%
ASTRAZENECA
1.30%
NOVARTIS
1.29%
NESTLE SA
1.19%
SHELL PLC
1.18%
SIEMENS
1.01%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.96%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.93%
Diversification
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 691 total
13.34%
QDX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 902 total
13.11%
Characteristics
Compare
XIN
QDX
| Provider | iShares | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.70% | 2.64% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2011 | January 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about XIN and QDX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or QDX?
As of June 5, 2026, XIN has returned 7.40% year to date, while QDX has returned 9.62%. QDX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or QDX?
As of June 5, 2026, XIN manages $1.87 B in assets, while QDX manages $1.62 B. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and QDX managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. QDX is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XIN and QDX emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology. QDX is most exposed to Financials, Industrials, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or QDX?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$135.44 M in net flows, compared with +$131.79 M for QDX. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and QDX compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while QDX has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
What are the top holdings of XIN and QDX?
XIN's largest holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS. QDX's top holdings include ASML HOLDING and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or QDX?
XIN holds 651 securities, while QDX holds 849. On holdings count, QDX is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XIN and QDX
International ETFs To Reduce U.S. Market Exposure
A look at International Equity ETFs worthy of consideration in a changing global landscape.
Posted on 3/6/2025 by Kyle Anthony inGlobal
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.