ZXLI
BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLI fund page
VS
HIND
Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF

Full HIND fund page

BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) and Harvest Industrial Leaders Income ETF (HIND) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials and Information Technology, while HIND leans towards Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZXLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.75% for HIND. Performance-wise, ZXLI has returned 14.01% year-to-date with +$15 M in net flows, whereas HIND is at 11.83% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%May 8May 15May 25Jun 1Jun 8

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 8, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLI
+2.22%+4.54%+14.01%+23.59%-
HIND
+2.34%+3.45%+11.83%+21.97%-
Flows
ZXLI
-$1 M-$7 M+$15 M+$17 M-
HIND
+$7 M+$17 M+$25 M+$39 M-

ZXLI vs HIND exposure

Countries

ZXLI
USA
92.73%
Ireland
7.19%
HIND
USA
90.80%
Other
9.20%

Sectors

ZXLI
Industrials
91.43%
Other
8.57%
HIND
Industrials
95.60%
As of June 8, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLI
CATERPILLAR
7.61%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.59%
US36828A1016
5.36%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
4.34%
BOEING U
3.30%
EATON CORP PLC
3.09%
UNION PACIFIC U
2.94%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.82%
DEERE
2.73%
HONEYWELL INTL
2.50%
HIND
CATERPILLAR
5.20%
US36828A1016
5.20%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.10%
EATON CORP PLC
5.10%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.10%
FASTENAL
5.10%
PARKER HANNIFIN
5.10%
DELTA AIR LINES
5.10%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.10%
AMETEK
5.10%

Diversification

ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 79 total
40.28%
HIND
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
51.20%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLI
HIND
ProviderBMOHarvest Portfolios Group
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkS&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD-
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.83%6.92%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025April 15, 2024

Frequently asked questions about ZXLI and HIND

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLI or HIND?
As of June 8, 2026, ZXLI has returned 14.01% year to date, while HIND has returned 11.83%. ZXLI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLI or HIND?
As of June 8, 2026, ZXLI manages $23.49 M in assets, while HIND manages $100.47 M. HIND is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLI and HIND managed?
ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. HIND is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index.
What sectors do ZXLI and HIND emphasize?
ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology. HIND is most exposed to Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLI or HIND?
Year to date, ZXLI has seen +$15.46 M in net flows, compared with +$24.54 M for HIND. HIND has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLI and HIND compare?
ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while HIND has an expense ratio of 0.99%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLI and HIND?
ZXLI's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. HIND's top holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLI or HIND?
ZXLI holds 77 securities, while HIND holds 20. On holdings count, ZXLI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZXLI and HIND

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds