VS
When evaluating costs, AAPP features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AAPP
HEWB
| AuM | $2.02 M | $342.83 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.70% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAPP | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | -3.04% | -2.49% | +29.28% | +44.09% | +177.79% | |
| Flows | AAPP | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | -$3 M | +$6 M | +$29 M | +$28 M | +$33 M |
AAPP vs HEWB exposure
Countries
AAPP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
AAPP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AAPP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
AAPP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
AAPP
HEWB
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Apple | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 13, 2026 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about AAPP and HEWB
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AAPP or HEWB?
As of October 20, 2026, AAPP manages $2.02 M in assets, while HEWB manages $342.83 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AAPP and HEWB managed?
AAPP is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Apple benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of AAPP and HEWB compare?
AAPP has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about AAPP and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.