VS
When evaluating costs, AAPU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, AAPU has returned 15.16% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 29.48% with -$429 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AAPU
HBNK
| AuM | $6.82 M | $803.00 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAPU | +1.03% | +39.77% | +15.16% | +103.89% | - |
HBNK | +11.27% | +28.71% | +29.48% | +73.16% | - | |
| Flows | AAPU | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | - |
HBNK | +$4 M | -$179 M | -$429 M | -$680 M | - |
AAPU vs HBNK exposure
Countries
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.93%
Sectors
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
99.93%
As of June 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
CDN IMPERIAL BK
17.03%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.96%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.65%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.56%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.46%
BNS
16.27%
Diversification
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
AAPU
HBNK
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Apple | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.58% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 3, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about AAPU and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AAPU or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, AAPU has returned 15.16% year to date, while HBNK has returned 29.48%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AAPU or HBNK?
As of June 19, 2026, AAPU manages $6.82 M in assets, while HBNK manages $803.00 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AAPU and HBNK managed?
AAPU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Apple benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AAPU or HBNK?
Year to date, AAPU has seen +$0.62 M in net flows, compared with -$429.10 M for HBNK. AAPU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AAPU and HBNK compare?
AAPU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about AAPU and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.