VS
When evaluating costs, AAPU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, AAPU has returned 14.88% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 28.83% with -$553 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AAPU
ZEB
| AuM | $6.80 M | $6,325.46 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.62% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 18, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAPU | -0.21% | +39.43% | +14.88% | +103.28% | - |
ZEB | +10.76% | +26.60% | +28.83% | +72.07% | +149.94% | |
| Flows | AAPU | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | - |
ZEB | +$661 M | +$366 M | -$553 M | -$355 M | -$1,261 M |
AAPU vs ZEB exposure
Countries
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 18, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%
Diversification
AAPU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
AAPU
ZEB
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Apple | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 3, 2025 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about AAPU and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AAPU or ZEB?
As of June 18, 2026, AAPU has returned 14.88% year to date, while ZEB has returned 28.83%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AAPU or ZEB?
As of June 18, 2026, AAPU manages $6.80 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.33 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AAPU and ZEB managed?
AAPU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Apple benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AAPU or ZEB?
Year to date, AAPU has seen +$0.62 M in net flows, compared with -$553.47 M for ZEB. AAPU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AAPU and ZEB compare?
AAPU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about AAPU and ZEB
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.