VS
When evaluating costs, ACHP features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ACHP
HEWB
| AuM | $2.11 M | $346.93 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.49% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACHP | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | +1.58% | -0.41% | +29.52% | +46.37% | +158.68% | |
| Flows | ACHP | - | - | - | - | - |
HEWB | +$6 M | +$13 M | +$32 M | +$31 M | +$39 M |
ACHP vs HEWB exposure
Countries
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
ACHP
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
ACHP
HEWB
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset Asia Semiconductor Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | September 21, 2026 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ACHP and HEWB
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ACHP or HEWB?
As of September 24, 2026, ACHP manages $2.11 M in assets, while HEWB manages $346.93 M. HEWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ACHP and HEWB managed?
ACHP is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Asia Semiconductor Index - CAD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of ACHP and HEWB compare?
ACHP has an expense ratio of 0.49%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about ACHP and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.