VS
When evaluating costs, AIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.4% for BAAA.U. Performance-wise, AIQ has returned 25.78% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas BAAA.U is at 2.26% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AIQ
BAAA.U
| AuM | $41.91 M | $26.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIQ | -0.50% | +5.29% | +25.78% | +23.79% | - |
BAAA.U | +0.40% | +1.20% | +2.26% | +2.00% | - | |
| Flows | AIQ | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | - |
BAAA.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | +$0 M |
AIQ vs BAAA.U exposure
Countries
AIQ
Other
100.00%
BAAA.U
Other
94.38%
Sectors
AIQ
Other
100.00%
BAAA.U
Other
94.38%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AIQ
US37954Y6326
99.89%
BAAA.U
US76676AAA88
5.74%
US08186PAU75
5.74%
US05591SAA06
5.73%
US36626CAA99
5.50%
US35455DAL10
5.02%
US89643BAS07
4.77%
Magnetite CLO, 2026-55A, FRN 15apr2039, USD (ABS, A1)
4.29%
US64132JAW53
4.07%
US29004MAA45
3.82%
US00851KAM71
3.82%
Diversification
AIQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
99.89%
BAAA.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 629 total
48.52%
Characteristics
Compare
AIQ
BAAA.U
| Provider | Global X | Brompton Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.07% | 1.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | April 10, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about AIQ and BAAA.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AIQ or BAAA.U?
As of October 15, 2026, AIQ has returned 25.78% year to date, while BAAA.U has returned 2.26%. AIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AIQ or BAAA.U?
As of October 15, 2026, AIQ manages $41.91 M in assets, while BAAA.U manages $26.96 M. AIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AIQ and BAAA.U managed?
AIQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD benchmark. BAAA.U is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AIQ or BAAA.U?
Year to date, AIQ has seen +$18.23 M in net flows, compared with +$3.50 M for BAAA.U. AIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AIQ and BAAA.U compare?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while BAAA.U has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIQ or BAAA.U?
AIQ holds 1 securities, while BAAA.U holds 55. On holdings count, BAAA.U is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.