VS
When evaluating costs, AIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.69% for NHYB. Performance-wise, AIQ has returned 25.78% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas NHYB is at 4.64% with +$193 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AIQ
NHYB
| AuM | $41.91 M | $1,501.66 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.68% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIQ | -0.50% | +5.29% | +25.78% | +23.79% | - |
NHYB | -1.90% | -3.16% | -4.64% | -5.14% | +2.60% | |
| Flows | AIQ | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | - |
NHYB | +$13 M | +$74 M | +$193 M | +$249 M | +$455 M |
AIQ vs NHYB exposure
Countries
AIQ
Other
100.00%
NHYB
Other
100.00%
Sectors
AIQ
Other
100.00%
NHYB
Other
100.00%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AIQ
US37954Y6326
99.89%
NHYB
US698ESCAA82
80.00%
Diversification
AIQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
99.89%
NHYB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
80.00%
Characteristics
Compare
AIQ
NHYB
| Provider | Global X | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | March 4, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about AIQ and NHYB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AIQ or NHYB?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ has returned 25.78% year to date, while NHYB has returned -4.64%. AIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AIQ or NHYB?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ manages $41.91 M in assets, while NHYB manages $1.50 B. NHYB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AIQ and NHYB managed?
AIQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD benchmark. NHYB is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AIQ or NHYB?
Year to date, AIQ has seen +$18.23 M in net flows, compared with +$192.73 M for NHYB. NHYB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AIQ and NHYB compare?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while NHYB has an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIQ or NHYB?
AIQ holds 1 securities, while NHYB holds 1. On holdings count, AIQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about AIQ and NHYB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.