VS
When evaluating costs, AIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.45% for ZBBZ.U. Performance-wise, AIQ has returned 25.78% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas ZBBZ.U is at 3.65% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AIQ
ZBBZ.U
| AuM | $41.91 M | $2.10 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIQ | -0.50% | +5.29% | +25.78% | +23.79% | - |
ZBBZ.U | +0.23% | +1.38% | +3.65% | +4.86% | - | |
| Flows | AIQ | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | - |
ZBBZ.U | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$2 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
AIQ vs ZBBZ.U exposure
Countries
AIQ
Other
100.00%
ZBBZ.U
Other
90.62%
USA
8.90%
Sectors
AIQ
Other
100.00%
ZBBZ.U
Other
90.62%
Industrials
8.85%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AIQ
US37954Y6326
99.89%
ZBBZ.U
US10548CAJ09
3.69%
US76857JAL61
3.37%
US74984FAG63
3.13%
US38181JAG40
3.09%
US67707ECA01
3.09%
US75884EAY86
2.40%
US25211AAU34
2.23%
US00037QAW96
2.23%
US64135PAQ19
1.99%
US817941AW76
1.96%
Diversification
AIQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
99.89%
ZBBZ.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 961 total
27.16%
Characteristics
Compare
AIQ
ZBBZ.U
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.07% | 6.56% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | September 9, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about AIQ and ZBBZ.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AIQ or ZBBZ.U?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ has returned 25.78% year to date, while ZBBZ.U has returned 3.65%. AIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AIQ or ZBBZ.U?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ manages $41.91 M in assets, while ZBBZ.U manages $2.10 M. AIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AIQ and ZBBZ.U managed?
AIQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD benchmark. ZBBZ.U is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AIQ or ZBBZ.U?
Year to date, AIQ has seen +$18.23 M in net flows, compared with -$2.07 M for ZBBZ.U. AIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AIQ and ZBBZ.U compare?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZBBZ.U has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIQ or ZBBZ.U?
AIQ holds 1 securities, while ZBBZ.U holds 72. On holdings count, ZBBZ.U is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.