VS
When evaluating costs, AIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.15% for ZMBS. Performance-wise, AIQ has returned 25.78% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas ZMBS is at 1.47% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AIQ
ZMBS
| AuM | $41.91 M | $436.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AIQ | -0.50% | +5.29% | +25.78% | +23.79% | - |
ZMBS | +0.54% | +0.16% | +1.47% | +1.62% | +13.89% | |
| Flows | AIQ | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$18 M | +$23 M | - |
ZMBS | -$10 M | -$15 M | +$1 M | +$19 M | +$132 M |
AIQ vs ZMBS exposure
Countries
AIQ
Other
100.00%
ZMBS
Other
100.00%
Sectors
AIQ
Other
100.00%
ZMBS
Other
100.00%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AIQ
US37954Y6326
99.89%
ZMBS
CA62989ZXQ58
12.50%
CA62978ZSZ40
9.71%
CA62976Z7R73
8.91%
CA62985ZGG06
6.71%
CA62973Z7C36
5.69%
CA62992ZXE73
4.91%
CA62969ZJ282
4.88%
CA62976ZU425
4.49%
CA62972ZWF93
4.48%
CA62982ZQC19
3.96%
Diversification
AIQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
99.89%
ZMBS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
66.23%
Characteristics
Compare
AIQ
ZMBS
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD | FTSE Canada NHA MBS 975 GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.07% | 3.05% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | February 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about AIQ and ZMBS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AIQ or ZMBS?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ has returned 25.78% year to date, while ZMBS has returned 1.47%. AIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AIQ or ZMBS?
As of October 16, 2026, AIQ manages $41.91 M in assets, while ZMBS manages $436.28 M. ZMBS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AIQ and ZMBS managed?
AIQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data NTR Index - USD benchmark. ZMBS is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada NHA MBS 975 GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AIQ or ZMBS?
Year to date, AIQ has seen +$18.23 M in net flows, compared with +$0.53 M for ZMBS. AIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AIQ and ZMBS compare?
AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while ZMBS has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Which ETF is more diversified: AIQ or ZMBS?
AIQ holds 1 securities, while ZMBS holds 1. On holdings count, AIQ is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.