VS
Compare AGF Energy Transition and Adaptation ETF (ATAP) vs iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ATAP provides Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy exposures, while XIN is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, ATAP features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.5% for XIN. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ATAP
XIN
| AuM | - | $1,916.63 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.48% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.43% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
XIN | -1.32% | +0.07% | +12.14% | +17.14% | +61.08% | |
| Flows | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
XIN | -$12 M | +$4 M | +$127 M | +$150 M | +$84 M |
ATAP vs XIN exposure
Countries
ATAP
USA
50.21%
Canada
23.50%
Other
13.15%
Other
13.14%
XIN
Japan
23.72%
United Kingdom
13.73%
Switzerland
9.83%
Germany
8.74%
France
8.69%
Other
35.29%
Sectors
ATAP
Industrials
31.96%
Non-Energy Materials
16.51%
Other
13.15%
Energy
9.37%
Technology
8.44%
Utilities
8.36%
Other
12.21%
XIN
Finance
27.65%
Industrials
15.79%
Technology
12.96%
Healthcare
9.68%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.94%
Non-Energy Materials
7.02%
Other
18.95%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ATAP
WSP Global, Inc.
5.88%
Cameco Corp.
5.31%
Baker Hughes Co.
4.06%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
3.97%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.89%
Prysmian SpA
3.79%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.46%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
3.30%
Metso Corp.
3.12%
Amphenol Corp.
3.06%
XIN
ASML Holding NV
2.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.59%
Roche Holding AG
1.37%
Novartis AG
1.25%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.10%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.08%
Siemens AG
1.07%
Diversification
ATAP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 31 total
39.84%
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
13.74%
Characteristics
Compare
ATAP
XIN
| Provider | AGF | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 10, 2020 | September 6, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about ATAP and XIN
How do the fees of ATAP and XIN compare?
ATAP has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What are the top holdings of ATAP and XIN?
ATAP's largest holdings include WSP Global, Inc., Cameco Corp., and Baker Hughes Co.. XIN's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: ATAP or XIN?
ATAP holds 31 securities, while XIN holds 650. On holdings count, XIN is the more diversified portfolio.
How are ATAP and XIN managed?
ATAP is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ATAP and XIN emphasize?
ATAP is most exposed to Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.