VS
Compare AGF Energy Transition and Adaptation ETF (ATAP) vs iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ATAP provides Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy exposures, while XWD is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ATAP features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.44% for XWD. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ATAP
XWD
| AuM | - | $1,821.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.48% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
XWD | +2.47% | +2.79% | +16.55% | +17.23% | +86.21% | |
| Flows | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
XWD | +$12 M | +$49 M | +$101 M | +$177 M | +$316 M |
ATAP vs XWD exposure
Countries
ATAP
USA
50.21%
Canada
23.50%
Other
13.15%
Other
13.14%
XWD
USA
70.29%
Other
29.71%
Sectors
ATAP
Industrials
31.96%
Non-Energy Materials
16.51%
Other
13.15%
Energy
9.37%
Technology
8.44%
Utilities
8.36%
Other
12.21%
XWD
Technology
35.81%
Finance
18.20%
Industrials
9.46%
Healthcare
8.90%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.44%
Other
19.20%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ATAP
WSP Global, Inc.
5.88%
Cameco Corp.
5.31%
Baker Hughes Co.
4.06%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
3.97%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.89%
Prysmian SpA
3.79%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.46%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
3.30%
Metso Corp.
3.12%
Amphenol Corp.
3.06%
XWD
NVIDIA Corp.
5.80%
Apple, Inc.
5.05%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.16%
Broadcom Inc.
1.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.72%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.36%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.17%
Tesla, Inc.
1.12%
Diversification
ATAP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 31 total
39.84%
XWD
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,222 total
27.14%
Characteristics
Compare
ATAP
XWD
| Provider | AGF | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 10, 2020 | June 18, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about ATAP and XWD
How do the fees of ATAP and XWD compare?
ATAP has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while XWD has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What are the top holdings of ATAP and XWD?
ATAP's largest holdings include WSP Global, Inc., Cameco Corp., and Baker Hughes Co.. XWD's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ATAP or XWD?
ATAP holds 31 securities, while XWD holds 1211. On holdings count, XWD is the more diversified portfolio.
How are ATAP and XWD managed?
ATAP is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. XWD is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI World Daily Total Return Net Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ATAP and XWD emphasize?
ATAP is most exposed to Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. XWD is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Recent articles about ATAP and XWD
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.