VS
Compare AGF Energy Transition and Adaptation ETF (ATAP) vs BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ATAP provides Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy exposures, while ZEA is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, ATAP features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.2% for ZEA. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ATAP
ZEA
| AuM | - | $13,678.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.65% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
ZEA | +0.07% | +0.15% | +14.06% | +15.91% | +73.79% | |
| Flows | ATAP | - | - | - | - | - |
ZEA | +$172 M | +$449 M | +$998 M | +$1,120 M | +$2,962 M |
ATAP vs ZEA exposure
Countries
ATAP
USA
50.21%
Canada
23.50%
Other
13.15%
Other
13.14%
ZEA
Japan
25.53%
United Kingdom
13.47%
Switzerland
9.03%
Germany
8.08%
France
7.96%
Australia
7.14%
Other
28.78%
Sectors
ATAP
Industrials
31.96%
Non-Energy Materials
16.51%
Other
13.15%
Energy
9.37%
Technology
8.44%
Utilities
8.36%
Other
12.21%
ZEA
Finance
27.10%
Industrials
16.18%
Technology
12.71%
Healthcare
9.12%
Non-Energy Materials
7.86%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.73%
Other
19.29%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ATAP
WSP Global, Inc.
5.88%
Cameco Corp.
5.31%
Baker Hughes Co.
4.06%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
3.97%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.89%
Prysmian SpA
3.79%
Generac Holdings, Inc.
3.46%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
3.30%
Metso Corp.
3.12%
Amphenol Corp.
3.06%
ZEA
ASML Holding NV
2.51%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.35%
Roche Holding AG
1.17%
Novartis AG
1.07%
Shell Plc
0.97%
Nestlé SA
0.96%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.94%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.94%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.93%
Siemens AG
0.92%
Diversification
ATAP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 31 total
39.84%
ZEA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,627 total
11.77%
Characteristics
Compare
ATAP
ZEA
| Provider | AGF | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.93% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | February 10, 2020 | February 10, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about ATAP and ZEA
How do the fees of ATAP and ZEA compare?
ATAP has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while ZEA has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of ATAP and ZEA?
ATAP's largest holdings include WSP Global, Inc., Cameco Corp., and Baker Hughes Co.. ZEA's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: ATAP or ZEA?
ATAP holds 31 securities, while ZEA holds 2608. On holdings count, ZEA is the more diversified portfolio.
How are ATAP and ZEA managed?
ATAP is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. ZEA is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ATAP and ZEA emphasize?
ATAP is most exposed to Industrials, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. ZEA is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about ATAP and ZEA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.