VS
When evaluating costs, ATRB features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, ATRB has returned 0.27% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 10.91% with -$56 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ATRB
ZUT
| AuM | $1.45 M | $838.99 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.74% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.80% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ATRB | -1.17% | -1.80% | -0.27% | +0.28% | - |
ZUT | -4.26% | -9.19% | +10.91% | +13.16% | +49.43% | |
| Flows | ATRB | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | - |
ZUT | +$61 M | +$80 M | -$56 M | -$61 M | +$263 M |
ATRB vs ZUT exposure
Countries
ATRB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
82.83%
Bermuda
17.17%
Sectors
ATRB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
82.26%
Energy
9.30%
Industrials
8.44%
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ATRB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
AltaGas Ltd.
9.30%
ATCO Ltd.
9.15%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.78%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.73%
Capital Power Corp.
8.69%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.44%
Northland Power, Inc.
8.00%
TransAlta Corp.
7.98%
Emera, Inc.
7.97%
Fortis, Inc.
7.90%
Diversification
ATRB
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.93%
Characteristics
Compare
ATRB
ZUT
| Provider | AGF | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 4.91% | 2.98% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 27, 2024 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about ATRB and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ATRB or ZUT?
As of September 24, 2026, ATRB has returned -0.27% year to date, while ZUT has returned 10.91%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ATRB or ZUT?
As of September 24, 2026, ATRB manages $1.45 M in assets, while ZUT manages $838.99 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ATRB and ZUT managed?
ATRB is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ATRB or ZUT?
Year to date, ATRB has seen +$0.25 M in net flows, compared with -$55.76 M for ZUT. ATRB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ATRB and ZUT compare?
ATRB has an expense ratio of 0.74%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about ATRB and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.