BASE
Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF

Full BASE fund page
VS
XBM
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF

Full XBM fund page

Evolve Global Materials & Mining Enhanced Yield Index ETF (BASE) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that BASE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Materials, while XBM leans towards Materials. When evaluating costs, BASE features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.55% for XBM. Performance-wise, BASE has returned 22.05% year-to-date with +$27 M in net flows, whereas XBM is at 16.58% with +$145 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

05101520%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BASE
+5.35%+3.07%+22.05%+51.12%+31.97%
XBM
+12.50%-4.98%+16.58%+92.25%+78.68%
Flows
BASE
-$1 M+$17 M+$27 M+$20 M+$36 M
XBM
+$32 M+$77 M+$145 M+$158 M+$120 M

BASE vs XBM exposure

Countries

BASE
USA
88.43%
Netherlands
7.86%
XBM
USA
55.61%
Canada
41.83%

Sectors

BASE
Materials
67.29%
Other
32.71%
XBM
Materials
68.82%
Other
31.18%
As of April 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BASE
LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES
7.86%
DOW INC
7.47%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
5.36%
US0886061086
5.28%
US6934831099
5.25%
ATI INC
5.19%
US7672041008
5.14%
US91912E1055
5.05%
ALCOA CORP
4.86%
STEEL DYNAMICS
4.75%
XBM
US7672041008
10.83%
US0886061086
10.60%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
10.21%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
9.29%
ALCOA CORP
6.90%
LUNDIN MINING
6.74%
FST QUANTUM MIN
6.47%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION
5.71%
HUDBAY MINERALS
3.33%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
2.61%

Diversification

BASE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
56.21%
XBM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 57 total
72.68%

Characteristics

Compare
BASE
XBM
ProviderEvolve ETFsiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield6.66%0.74%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 12, 2019April 12, 2011

Frequently asked questions about BASE and XBM

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BASE or XBM?
As of April 28, 2026, BASE has returned 22.05% year to date, while XBM has returned 16.58%. BASE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BASE or XBM?
As of April 28, 2026, BASE manages $81.88 M in assets, while XBM manages $547.11 M. XBM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BASE and XBM managed?
BASE is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. XBM is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do BASE and XBM emphasize?
BASE is most exposed to Materials. XBM is most exposed to Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BASE or XBM?
Year to date, BASE has seen +$27.23 M in net flows, compared with +$144.92 M for XBM. XBM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BASE and XBM compare?
BASE has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while XBM has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
What are the top holdings of BASE and XBM?
BASE's largest holdings include LYONDELLBASELL INDUSTRIES and DOW INC. XBM's top holdings include FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC and TECK RESOURCES LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: BASE or XBM?
BASE holds 14 securities, while XBM holds 39. On holdings count, XBM is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about BASE and XBM

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds