VS
When evaluating costs, BEPR features a management fee (MER) of 2.35%, compared to 0.69% for NHYB. Performance-wise, BEPR has returned 1.71% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas NHYB is at 4.06% with +$183 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BEPR
NHYB
| AuM | $56.47 M | $1,500.87 M |
| Management Fees | 2.35% | 0.69% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.53% | 0.68% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BEPR | -1.24% | -1.91% | -1.71% | -1.18% | +27.22% |
NHYB | -2.03% | -2.53% | -4.06% | -4.33% | +2.42% | |
| Flows | BEPR | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$10 M | -$9 M | +$3 M |
NHYB | +$20 M | +$75 M | +$183 M | +$249 M | +$435 M |
BEPR vs NHYB exposure
Countries
BEPR
USA
67.23%
Canada
9.88%
United Kingdom
7.64%
Other
15.25%
NHYB
Other
100.00%
Sectors
BEPR
Finance
77.75%
Utilities
15.10%
Other
7.16%
NHYB
Other
100.00%
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BEPR
Delphi Financial Group, 7.376% 15may2037, USD
5.48%
Metlife, 10.75% 1aug2069, USD
3.64%
Provident Financing Trust I, 7.405% 15mar2038, USD
3.44%
Liberty Mutual Insurance, 7.697% 15oct2097, USD
2.70%
Everest Reinsurance Holdings, 6.6% 1may2067, USD
2.39%
Fifth Third Bancorp
2.38%
ING Groep, 7.5% perp., USD
2.19%
Liberty Mutual Group, 7.8% 7mar2087, USD
1.82%
Zions Bancorporation, 6.816% 19nov2035, USD
1.47%
Lincoln National, FRN 17may2066, USD
1.42%
NHYB
US698ESCAA82
80.00%
Diversification
BEPR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 177 total
26.90%
NHYB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
80.00%
Characteristics
Compare
BEPR
NHYB
| Provider | Brompton Group | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.13% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 26, 2021 | March 4, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about BEPR and NHYB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BEPR or NHYB?
As of September 24, 2026, BEPR has returned -1.71% year to date, while NHYB has returned -4.06%. BEPR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BEPR or NHYB?
As of September 24, 2026, BEPR manages $56.47 M in assets, while NHYB manages $1.50 B. NHYB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BEPR and NHYB managed?
BEPR is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. NHYB is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BEPR or NHYB?
Year to date, BEPR has seen -$10.11 M in net flows, compared with +$182.84 M for NHYB. NHYB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BEPR and NHYB compare?
BEPR has an expense ratio of 3.53%, while NHYB has an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Which ETF is more diversified: BEPR or NHYB?
BEPR holds 170 securities, while NHYB holds 1. On holdings count, BEPR is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about BEPR and NHYB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.