VS
When evaluating costs, BEPR features a management fee (MER) of 2.35%, compared to 0.65% for ZPW. Performance-wise, BEPR has returned 1.71% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas ZPW is at 12.15% with +$20 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BEPR
ZPW
| AuM | $56.47 M | $113.00 M |
| Management Fees | 2.35% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 3.53% | 0.71% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BEPR | -1.24% | -1.91% | -1.71% | -1.18% | +27.22% |
ZPW | +4.01% | +9.11% | +12.15% | +14.86% | +45.93% | |
| Flows | BEPR | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$10 M | -$9 M | +$3 M |
ZPW | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$20 M | +$29 M | +$43 M |
BEPR vs ZPW exposure
Countries
BEPR
USA
67.23%
Canada
9.88%
United Kingdom
7.64%
Other
15.25%
ZPW
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BEPR
Finance
77.75%
Utilities
15.10%
Other
7.16%
ZPW
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BEPR
Delphi Financial Group, 7.376% 15may2037, USD
5.48%
Metlife, 10.75% 1aug2069, USD
3.64%
Provident Financing Trust I, 7.405% 15mar2038, USD
3.44%
Liberty Mutual Insurance, 7.697% 15oct2097, USD
2.70%
Everest Reinsurance Holdings, 6.6% 1may2067, USD
2.39%
Fifth Third Bancorp
2.38%
ING Groep, 7.5% perp., USD
2.19%
Liberty Mutual Group, 7.8% 7mar2087, USD
1.82%
Zions Bancorporation, 6.816% 19nov2035, USD
1.47%
Lincoln National, FRN 17may2066, USD
1.42%
ZPW
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BEPR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 177 total
26.90%
ZPW
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BEPR
ZPW
| Provider | Brompton Group | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 9.13% | 9.09% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 26, 2021 | September 2, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about BEPR and ZPW
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BEPR or ZPW?
As of September 24, 2026, BEPR has returned -1.71% year to date, while ZPW has returned 12.15%. ZPW is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BEPR or ZPW?
As of September 24, 2026, BEPR manages $56.47 M in assets, while ZPW manages $113.00 M. ZPW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BEPR and ZPW managed?
BEPR is actively managed by Brompton Group. It does not track an index. ZPW is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BEPR or ZPW?
Year to date, BEPR has seen -$10.11 M in net flows, compared with +$20.39 M for ZPW. ZPW has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BEPR and ZPW compare?
BEPR has an expense ratio of 3.53%, while ZPW has an expense ratio of 0.71%.
Recent articles about BEPR and ZPW
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.