BGIF
BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series

Full BGIF fund page
VS
CIF
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Full CIF fund page

Compare BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (BGIF) vs iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. BGIF and CIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, BGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 0.65% for CIF. Performance-wise, BGIF has returned 8.58% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas CIF is at 24.13% with +$323 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BGIF
+0.54%+1.68%+8.58%+14.47%-
CIF
-0.50%+10.76%+24.13%+40.81%+115.31%
Flows
BGIF
-$0 M+$1 M+$2 M-$60 M-
CIF
+$117 M+$208 M+$323 M+$536 M+$678 M

BGIF vs CIF exposure

Countries

BGIF
USA
42.14%
Canada
14.15%
Spain
8.98%
Other
34.72%
CIF
USA
58.47%
Canada
32.53%
Other
9.00%

Sectors

BGIF
Utilities
44.08%
Industrials
26.12%
Energy
20.12%
Other
9.68%
CIF
Utilities
32.71%
Other
26.76%
Industrials
24.27%
Energy
16.26%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BGIF
NEXTERA ENERGY
6.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.28%
ES0105046017
4.89%
TRANSURBAN GRP REIT
4.20%
DUKE ENERGY
4.14%
IBERDROLA SA
4.09%
WILLIAMS
3.85%
SOUTHERN
3.54%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
2.90%
TC ENERGY CORP
2.82%
CIF
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC
5.55%
ATCO
4.71%
US29278D1054
4.25%
US20441A1025
4.21%
CATERPILLAR
4.16%
TARGA RESOURCS
4.03%
SCORPIO TANKERS
3.66%
EDISON INTERNATIONAL
3.35%
STANTEC
3.27%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
3.19%

Diversification

BGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
42.32%
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
40.39%

Characteristics

Compare
BGIF
CIF
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.79%1.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 26, 2023August 27, 2008

Frequently asked questions about BGIF and CIF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGIF or CIF?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF has returned 8.58% year to date, while CIF has returned 24.13%. CIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGIF or CIF?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF manages $2.69 M in assets, while CIF manages $1.51 B. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGIF and CIF managed?
BGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do BGIF and CIF emphasize?
BGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGIF or CIF?
Year to date, BGIF has seen +$1.60 M in net flows, compared with +$322.96 M for CIF. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGIF and CIF compare?
BGIF has an expense ratio of 1.17%, while CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of BGIF and CIF?
BGIF's largest holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY and ENBRIDGE. CIF's top holdings include STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC and ATCO.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGIF or CIF?
BGIF holds 39 securities, while CIF holds 45. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about BGIF and CIF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds