VS
When evaluating costs, BGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 0.45% for QIF. Performance-wise, BGIF has returned 8.58% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas QIF is at 12.58% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGIF
QIF
| AuM | $2.69 M | $145.28 M |
| Management Fees | 1.19% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.17% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGIF | +0.54% | +1.68% | +8.58% | +14.47% | - |
QIF | -0.75% | +3.33% | +12.58% | +20.68% | +58.26% | |
| Flows | BGIF | -$0 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$60 M | - |
QIF | -$0 M | -$4 M | -$11 M | -$53 M | -$161 M |
BGIF vs QIF exposure
Countries
BGIF
USA
42.14%
Canada
14.15%
Spain
8.98%
Other
34.72%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BGIF
Utilities
44.08%
Industrials
26.12%
Energy
20.12%
Other
9.68%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGIF
NEXTERA ENERGY
6.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.28%
ES0105046017
4.89%
TRANSURBAN GRP REIT
4.20%
DUKE ENERGY
4.14%
IBERDROLA SA
4.09%
WILLIAMS
3.85%
SOUTHERN
3.54%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
2.90%
TC ENERGY CORP
2.82%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
42.32%
QIF
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about BGIF and QIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGIF or QIF?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF has returned 8.58% year to date, while QIF has returned 12.58%. QIF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGIF or QIF?
As of June 11, 2026, BGIF manages $2.69 M in assets, while QIF manages $145.28 M. QIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGIF and QIF managed?
BGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGIF or QIF?
Year to date, BGIF has seen +$1.60 M in net flows, compared with -$11.03 M for QIF. BGIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGIF and QIF compare?
BGIF has an expense ratio of 1.17%, while QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Recent articles about BGIF and QIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.