BGIF
BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series

Full BGIF fund page
VS
TINF
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF

Full TINF fund page

Compare BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (BGIF) vs TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. BGIF and TINF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, BGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 0.65% for TINF. Performance-wise, BGIF has returned 9.78% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas TINF is at 12.6% with +$119 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BGIF
+1.61%+2.86%+9.78%+15.26%-
TINF
+1.91%+4.03%+12.60%+16.90%+62.50%
Flows
BGIF
-$0 M+$1 M+$2 M-$60 M-
TINF
+$21 M+$68 M+$119 M+$210 M+$241 M

BGIF vs TINF exposure

Countries

BGIF
USA
42.14%
Canada
14.15%
Spain
8.98%
Other
34.72%
TINF
USA
43.82%
Other
15.38%
Canada
7.47%
Other
33.33%

Sectors

BGIF
Utilities
44.08%
Industrials
26.12%
Energy
20.12%
Other
9.68%
TINF
Utilities
34.20%
Other
22.22%
Industrials
22.14%
Energy
21.44%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BGIF
NEXTERA ENERGY
6.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.28%
ES0105046017
4.89%
TRANSURBAN GRP REIT
4.20%
DUKE ENERGY
4.14%
IBERDROLA SA
4.09%
WILLIAMS
3.85%
SOUTHERN
3.54%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
2.90%
TC ENERGY CORP
2.82%
TINF
AENA SME
5.53%
NEXTERA ENERGY
5.47%
WILLIAMS
4.49%
ENBRIDGE
4.09%
SOUTHERN
3.75%
ENEL GLOBAL TRADING
3.50%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.38%
US4005061019
3.23%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER
3.22%
FLUGHAFEN ZUERICH AG KLOTEN COMMON SHARES
3.14%

Diversification

BGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 41 total
42.32%
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 40 total
39.80%

Characteristics

Compare
BGIF
TINF
ProviderBMOTD Asset Management
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.76%1.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 26, 2023June 2, 2020

Frequently asked questions about BGIF and TINF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGIF or TINF?
As of June 12, 2026, BGIF has returned 9.78% year to date, while TINF has returned 12.60%. TINF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGIF or TINF?
As of June 12, 2026, BGIF manages $2.72 M in assets, while TINF manages $421.98 M. TINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGIF and TINF managed?
BGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do BGIF and TINF emphasize?
BGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGIF or TINF?
Year to date, BGIF has seen +$1.60 M in net flows, compared with +$118.73 M for TINF. TINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGIF and TINF compare?
BGIF has an expense ratio of 1.17%, while TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of BGIF and TINF?
BGIF's largest holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY and ENBRIDGE. TINF's top holdings include AENA SME and NEXTERA ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGIF or TINF?
BGIF holds 39 securities, while TINF holds 38. On holdings count, BGIF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about BGIF and TINF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds