VS
When evaluating costs, BNKL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 1.15% for QQU. Performance-wise, BNKL has returned 35.2% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas QQU is at 33.31% with -$67 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BNKL
QQU
| AuM | $12.72 M | $492.29 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 1.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.16% | 1.43% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BNKL | -0.61% | -3.84% | +35.20% | +56.57% | +216.81% |
QQU | +5.78% | -1.88% | +33.31% | +35.78% | +197.50% | |
| Flows | BNKL | +$1 M | -$1 M | -$0 M | -$9 M | -$6 M |
QQU | -$15 M | -$4 M | -$67 M | -$73 M | -$218 M |
BNKL vs QQU exposure
Countries
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
QQU
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
QQU
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
QQU
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BNKL
Exposure data will be available soon
QQU
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BNKL
QQU
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.89% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2023 | June 17, 2008 |
Frequently asked questions about BNKL and QQU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BNKL or QQU?
As of September 30, 2026, BNKL has returned 35.20% year to date, while QQU has returned 33.31%. BNKL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BNKL or QQU?
As of September 30, 2026, BNKL manages $12.72 M in assets, while QQU manages $492.29 M. QQU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BNKL and QQU managed?
BNKL is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. QQU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BNKL or QQU?
Year to date, BNKL has seen -$0.10 M in net flows, compared with -$67.12 M for QQU. BNKL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BNKL and QQU compare?
BNKL has an expense ratio of 1.16%, while QQU has an expense ratio of 1.43%.
Recent articles about BNKL and QQU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.