VS
When evaluating costs, BNKU features a management fee (MER) of 1.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, BNKU has returned 99.65% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 18.78% with -$73 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BNKU
ZUT
| AuM | $26.92 M | $876.51 M |
| Management Fees | 1.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.55% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.71% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BNKU | +9.77% | -4.27% | +99.65% | +156.87% | - |
ZUT | +4.23% | -1.99% | +18.78% | +11.65% | +68.13% | |
| Flows | BNKU | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$4 M | -$9 M | - |
ZUT | -$16 M | +$47 M | -$73 M | -$14 M | +$288 M |
BNKU vs ZUT exposure
Countries
BNKU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
83.93%
Bermuda
16.07%
Sectors
BNKU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
83.24%
Energy
8.44%
Industrials
8.32%
As of November 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BNKU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Northland Power, Inc.
9.17%
TransAlta Corp.
8.59%
ATCO Ltd.
8.53%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.44%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.43%
Fortis, Inc.
8.34%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
8.32%
Capital Power Corp.
8.27%
Emera, Inc.
8.26%
Hydro One Ltd.
8.15%
Diversification
BNKU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12 total
84.50%
Characteristics
Compare
BNKU
ZUT
| Provider | LongPoint Asset Management | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 28, 2025 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about BNKU and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BNKU or ZUT?
As of November 2, 2026, BNKU has returned 99.65% year to date, while ZUT has returned 18.78%. BNKU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BNKU or ZUT?
As of November 2, 2026, BNKU manages $26.92 M in assets, while ZUT manages $876.51 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BNKU and ZUT managed?
BNKU is passively managed by LongPoint Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BNKU or ZUT?
Year to date, BNKU has seen -$3.61 M in net flows, compared with -$72.83 M for ZUT. BNKU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BNKU and ZUT compare?
BNKU has an expense ratio of 1.55%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about BNKU and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.