BTCC.J
Purpose Bitcoin ETF

Full BTCC.J fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, BTCC.J features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, BTCC.J has returned 25.16% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.7% with -$13 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Jun 30Jul 8Jul 15Jul 22Jul 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BTCC.J
+8.76%-12.95%-25.16%-44.75%+125.54%
ZEB
+0.43%+16.10%+32.70%+67.40%+146.66%
Flows
BTCC.J
+$0 M+$0 M-$0 M+$0 M+$1 M
ZEB
+$550 M+$1,053 M-$13 M+$264 M-$820 M

BTCC.J vs ZEB exposure

Countries

BTCC.J
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

BTCC.J
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BTCC.J
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

BTCC.J
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
BTCC.J
ZEB
ProviderPurpose InvestmentsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyNo incomeDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 9, 2021October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about BTCC.J and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCC.J or ZEB?
As of July 30, 2026, BTCC.J has returned -25.16% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.70%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCC.J or ZEB?
As of July 30, 2026, BTCC.J manages $1.38 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.03 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCC.J and ZEB managed?
BTCC.J is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCC.J or ZEB?
Year to date, BTCC.J has seen -$0.02 M in net flows, compared with -$12.93 M for ZEB. BTCC.J has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCC.J and ZEB compare?
BTCC.J has an expense ratio of 1.47%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Recent articles about BTCC.J and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds