When evaluating costs, BTCQ features a management fee (MER) of 1.25%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, BTCQ has returned 27.74% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.41% with +$419 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BTCQ
ZSP
| AuM | $147.58 M | $23,661.20 M |
| Management Fees | 1.25% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.47% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.88% | -0.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTCQ | -20.85% | -8.17% | -27.74% | -42.36% | +127.68% |
ZSP | +2.18% | +12.21% | +10.41% | +26.91% | +86.05% | |
| Flows | BTCQ | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$5 M | -$12 M | -$52 M |
ZSP | -$47 M | +$51 M | +$419 M | +$1,431 M | +$4,964 M |
BTCQ vs ZSP exposure
Countries
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%
Sectors
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
Diversification
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%
Characteristics
Compare
BTCQ
ZSP
| Provider | 3iQ | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 31, 2021 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about BTCQ and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCQ or ZSP?
As of June 8, 2026, BTCQ has returned -27.74% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.41%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCQ or ZSP?
As of June 8, 2026, BTCQ manages $147.58 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.66 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCQ and ZSP managed?
BTCQ is passively managed by 3iQ. It tracks the MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCQ or ZSP?
Year to date, BTCQ has seen -$4.72 M in net flows, compared with +$418.96 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCQ and ZSP compare?
BTCQ has an expense ratio of 1.47%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about BTCQ and ZSP
Bitcoin on the Verge of $100,000
Bitcoin climbs to $97K, driven by reserve rumors, SEC shifts, and Bitcoin spot ETF options launch.
Posted on 11/25/2024 by ETF Market Canada inCryptocurrencies
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.