VS
When evaluating costs, BTCQ features a management fee (MER) of 1.25%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, BTCQ has returned 27.74% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 19.01% with -$67 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BTCQ
ZUT
| AuM | $147.58 M | $891.48 M |
| Management Fees | 1.25% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.47% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.88% | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTCQ | -20.85% | -8.17% | -27.74% | -42.36% | +127.68% |
ZUT | +2.79% | +9.35% | +19.01% | +28.50% | +44.66% | |
| Flows | BTCQ | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$5 M | -$12 M | -$52 M |
ZUT | -$4 M | +$16 M | -$67 M | +$134 M | +$240 M |
BTCQ vs ZUT exposure
Countries
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
BTCQ
ZUT
| Provider | 3iQ | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 31, 2021 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about BTCQ and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCQ or ZUT?
As of June 8, 2026, BTCQ has returned -27.74% year to date, while ZUT has returned 19.01%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCQ or ZUT?
As of June 8, 2026, BTCQ manages $147.58 M in assets, while ZUT manages $891.48 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCQ and ZUT managed?
BTCQ is passively managed by 3iQ. It tracks the MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCQ or ZUT?
Year to date, BTCQ has seen -$4.72 M in net flows, compared with -$67.36 M for ZUT. BTCQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCQ and ZUT compare?
BTCQ has an expense ratio of 1.47%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about BTCQ and ZUT
Bitcoin on the Verge of $100,000
Bitcoin climbs to $97K, driven by reserve rumors, SEC shifts, and Bitcoin spot ETF options launch.
Posted on 11/25/2024 by ETF Market Canada inCryptocurrencies
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.