VS
When evaluating costs, BUFR features a management fee (MER) of 1.1%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, BUFR has returned 7.26% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 15.41% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BUFR
XIC
| AuM | $19.48 M | $32,698.50 M |
| Management Fees | 1.10% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.11% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUFR | +1.29% | +3.41% | +7.26% | +13.45% | +42.37% |
XIC | +2.81% | +8.25% | +15.41% | +34.08% | +94.14% | |
| Flows | BUFR | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$6 M | +$6 M | +$15 M |
XIC | +$971 M | +$1,926 M | +$7,096 M | +$8,352 M | +$13,210 M |
BUFR vs XIC exposure
Countries
BUFR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
BUFR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of August 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BUFR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
BUFR
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
BUFR
XIC
| Provider | First Trust | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 25, 2023 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about BUFR and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BUFR or XIC?
As of August 5, 2026, BUFR has returned 7.26% year to date, while XIC has returned 15.41%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BUFR or XIC?
As of August 5, 2026, BUFR manages $19.48 M in assets, while XIC manages $32.70 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BUFR and XIC managed?
BUFR is actively managed by First Trust. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BUFR or XIC?
Year to date, BUFR has seen +$5.70 M in net flows, compared with +$7,096.13 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BUFR and XIC compare?
BUFR has an expense ratio of 1.11%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about BUFR and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.