VS
Compare Evolve Global Defense & Aerospace Index ETF (CAMO) vs iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CAMO provides Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals, and Non-Energy Materials exposures, while XGI is primarily weighted in Industrials, Business Services, and Technology. When evaluating costs, CAMO features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.63% for XGI. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CAMO
XGI
| AuM | $2.64 M | $158.23 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.63% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.67% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.76% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAMO | -2.53% | - | - | - | - |
XGI | -1.07% | -4.27% | +7.84% | +10.45% | +65.29% | |
| Flows | CAMO | +$1 M | - | - | - | - |
XGI | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$23 M | +$49 M |
CAMO vs XGI exposure
Countries
CAMO
USA
23.67%
United Kingdom
16.52%
France
13.09%
Germany
12.51%
Netherlands
7.21%
Republic of Korea
7.10%
Other
19.90%
XGI
USA
50.78%
Japan
14.10%
Other
35.12%
Sectors
CAMO
Industrials
96.53%
XGI
Industrials
83.38%
Other
16.62%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CAMO
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
7.52%
Safran SA
7.38%
BAE Systems Plc
7.28%
Rheinmetall AG
7.26%
Airbus SE
7.21%
GE Aerospace
5.91%
Saab AB
4.75%
RTX Corp.
4.65%
Thales SA
4.61%
Leonardo SpA
4.49%
XGI
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.63%
GE Aerospace
3.46%
RTX Corp.
2.76%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.38%
Siemens AG
2.36%
Schneider Electric SE
1.83%
Union Pacific Corp.
1.76%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.72%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.66%
Deere & Co.
1.62%
Diversification
CAMO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 45 total
61.07%
XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 218 total
23.18%
Characteristics
Compare
CAMO
XGI
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Leaders Defense & Aerospace Index - CAD | S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.30% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 19, 2026 | March 26, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about CAMO and XGI
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CAMO or XGI?
As of October 15, 2026, CAMO manages $2.64 M in assets, while XGI manages $158.23 M. XGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CAMO and XGI managed?
CAMO is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Global Leaders Defense & Aerospace Index - CAD benchmark. XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CAMO and XGI emphasize?
CAMO is most exposed to Industrials, Consumer Cyclicals, and Non-Energy Materials. XGI is most exposed to Industrials, Business Services, and Technology.
How do the fees of CAMO and XGI compare?
CAMO has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while XGI has an expense ratio of 0.67%.
What are the top holdings of CAMO and XGI?
CAMO's largest holdings include Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, Safran SA, and BAE Systems Plc. XGI's top holdings include Caterpillar, Inc., GE Aerospace, and RTX Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CAMO or XGI?
CAMO holds 45 securities, while XGI holds 214. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.