VS
When evaluating costs, CANL features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 1.15% for GDXU. Performance-wise, CANL has returned 20.59% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas GDXU is at 14.38% with -$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CANL
GDXU
| AuM | $11.66 M | $244.39 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 1.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.17% | 1.35% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CANL | +3.03% | +3.07% | +20.59% | +27.50% | +117.88% |
GDXU | -9.73% | +44.52% | -14.38% | -11.58% | +679.69% | |
| Flows | CANL | -$1 M | +$2 M | +$6 M | +$6 M | +$6 M |
GDXU | +$0 M | +$3 M | -$15 M | -$40 M | -$171 M |
CANL vs GDXU exposure
Countries
CANL
Exposure data will be available soon
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CANL
Exposure data will be available soon
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CANL
Exposure data will be available soon
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CANL
Exposure data will be available soon
GDXU
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CANL
GDXU
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.39% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 5, 2023 | June 25, 2007 |
Frequently asked questions about CANL and GDXU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CANL or GDXU?
As of October 16, 2026, CANL has returned 20.59% year to date, while GDXU has returned -14.38%. CANL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CANL or GDXU?
As of October 16, 2026, CANL manages $11.66 M in assets, while GDXU manages $244.39 M. GDXU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CANL and GDXU managed?
CANL is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. GDXU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Canadian Gold Miners GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CANL or GDXU?
Year to date, CANL has seen +$5.54 M in net flows, compared with -$15.40 M for GDXU. CANL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CANL and GDXU compare?
CANL has an expense ratio of 1.17%, while GDXU has an expense ratio of 1.35%.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.