VS
When evaluating costs, CASH features a management fee (MER) of 0.11%, compared to 0.15% for HISA. Performance-wise, CASH has returned 0.68% year-to-date with +$62 M in net flows, whereas HISA is at 0.68% with +$95 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CASH
HISA
| AuM | $6,702.88 M | $1,302.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.11% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.11% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CASH | +0.17% | +0.49% | +0.68% | +2.28% | +11.56% |
HISA | +0.18% | +0.51% | +0.68% | +2.33% | +11.70% | |
| Flows | CASH | -$150 M | -$46 M | +$62 M | +$165 M | +$4,287 M |
HISA | +$62 M | +$90 M | +$95 M | -$58 M | -$169 M |
CASH vs HISA exposure
Countries
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
HISA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CASH
HISA
| Provider | Global X | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.24% | 2.30% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2021 | November 21, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CASH and HISA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CASH or HISA?
As of April 30, 2026, CASH has returned 0.68% year to date, while HISA has returned 0.68%. HISA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CASH or HISA?
As of April 30, 2026, CASH manages $6.70 B in assets, while HISA manages $1.30 B. CASH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CASH and HISA managed?
CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. HISA is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CASH or HISA?
Year to date, CASH has seen +$61.84 M in net flows, compared with +$95.26 M for HISA. HISA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CASH and HISA compare?
CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while HISA has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about CASH and HISA
High Interest Cash ETFs: All You Need to Know Heading Into 2024
Interest in these ETFs has persisted throughout 2023 amid a "higher for longer" interest rate environment.
Posted on 12/11/2023 by Jean-Charles Senant inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.