CASH
Global X High Interest Savings ETF

Full CASH fund page
VS
ZAG
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Full ZAG fund page

When evaluating costs, CASH features a management fee (MER) of 0.11%, compared to 0.08% for ZAG. Performance-wise, CASH has returned 0.64% year-to-date with +$96 M in net flows, whereas ZAG is at 0.87% with +$106 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.00.51.01.5%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CASH
+0.17%+0.49%+0.64%+2.29%+11.62%
ZAG
+1.50%+0.07%+0.87%+2.90%+11.01%
Flows
CASH
-$112 M-$62 M+$96 M+$176 M+$4,336 M
ZAG
+$30 M+$65 M+$106 M+$1,629 M+$6,009 M

CASH vs ZAG exposure

Countries

CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Municipal
29.15%
Sovereign
25.83%
Other
14.55%
Government agencies
9.37%
Other
21.10%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Canada, Bonds 3% 1jun2034, CAD
4.29%
Canada, Bond 2.25 1jun2029 10Y
3.59%
Province of Quebec, 2.75% 1sep2028, CAD (B124)
2.92%
Canada Housing Trust, 1.1% 15mar2031, CAD (95)
2.65%
Canada, Bond 2.75 1dec2048 30Y
2.46%
Province of Quebec, 3.5% 1dec2048, CAD (B117)
2.41%
Canada, Bonds 4% 1mar2029, CAD
2.27%
Canada Housing Trust, 3.55% 15sep2032, CAD (107)
2.22%
Bank of Montreal, 3.19% 1mar2028, CAD
2.20%
Province of Ontario, 2.9% 2jun2028, CAD (DMTN238)
2.20%

Diversification

CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
ZAG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 86 total
27.20%

Characteristics

Compare
CASH
ZAG
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.31%3.46%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 2, 2021January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about CASH and ZAG

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CASH or ZAG?
As of April 24, 2026, CASH has returned 0.64% year to date, while ZAG has returned 0.87%. ZAG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CASH or ZAG?
As of April 24, 2026, CASH manages $6.74 B in assets, while ZAG manages $12.30 B. ZAG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CASH and ZAG managed?
CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZAG is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the FTSE Canada Universe Bond TR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CASH or ZAG?
Year to date, CASH has seen +$95.65 M in net flows, compared with +$105.84 M for ZAG. ZAG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CASH and ZAG compare?
CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while ZAG has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about CASH and ZAG

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds