CAUS
Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF

Full CAUS fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Avantis CIBC U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (CAUS) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CAUS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while HBNK leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CAUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.19%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CAUS
-1.40%+8.09%---
HBNK
+1.99%+16.52%+32.72%+67.44%+149.42%
Flows
CAUS
+$67 M+$293 M---
HBNK
-$33 M+$8 M-$462 M-$768 M-$7 M

CAUS vs HBNK exposure

Countries

CAUS
USA
95.50%
HBNK
Canada
99.94%

Sectors

CAUS
Technology
34.78%
Finance
15.91%
Industrials
10.51%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.00%
Healthcare
7.67%
Other
22.14%
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CAUS
NVIDIA Corp.
5.09%
Apple, Inc.
4.63%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Microsoft Corp.
3.14%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.07%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.67%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.32%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.20%
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%

Diversification

CAUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,043 total
26.56%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%

Characteristics

Compare
CAUS
HBNK
ProviderCIBCGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.54%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 20, 2026July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CAUS and HBNK

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CAUS or HBNK?
As of July 20, 2026, CAUS manages $352.09 M in assets, while HBNK manages $787.51 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CAUS and HBNK managed?
CAUS is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CAUS and HBNK emphasize?
CAUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. HBNK is most exposed to Finance.
How do the fees of CAUS and HBNK compare?
CAUS has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of CAUS and HBNK?
CAUS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. HBNK's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: CAUS or HBNK?
CAUS holds 2014 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, CAUS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CAUS and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds