CBAL
CI Balanced Asset Allocation ETF

Full CBAL fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, CBAL features a management fee (MER) of 0.22%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, CBAL has returned 7.54% year-to-date with +$64 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 11.96% with +$291 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0%Jun 22Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CBAL
-1.43%+2.83%+7.54%+15.99%+45.43%
ZSP
+0.08%+8.15%+11.96%+22.47%+80.87%
Flows
CBAL
+$15 M+$30 M+$64 M+$106 M+$145 M
ZSP
-$96 M+$12 M+$291 M+$899 M+$5,074 M

CBAL vs ZSP exposure

Countries

CBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.59%

Sectors

CBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
As of July 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%

Diversification

CBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%

Characteristics

Compare
CBAL
ZSP
ProviderCIBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.80%0.77%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 17, 2023November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about CBAL and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CBAL or ZSP?
As of July 20, 2026, CBAL has returned 7.54% year to date, while ZSP has returned 11.96%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CBAL or ZSP?
As of July 20, 2026, CBAL manages $160.04 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.83 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CBAL and ZSP managed?
CBAL is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CBAL or ZSP?
Year to date, CBAL has seen +$64.40 M in net flows, compared with +$290.69 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CBAL and ZSP compare?
CBAL has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about CBAL and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds
Get ETF updates by email

Never miss the latest Canadian ETF Investing news and updates