CBIL
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF

Full CBIL fund page
VS
CSAV
CI First Asset High Interest Savings ETF

Full CSAV fund page

When evaluating costs, CBIL features a management fee (MER) of 0.1%, compared to 0.14% for CSAV. Performance-wise, CBIL has returned 0.66% year-to-date with +$632 M in net flows, whereas CSAV is at 0.64% with -$415 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.00.10.10.10.2%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CBIL
+0.18%+0.51%+0.66%+2.38%+8.23%
CSAV
+0.17%+0.50%+0.64%+2.30%+11.55%
Flows
CBIL
+$88 M+$529 M+$632 M+$538 M+$2,177 M
CSAV
-$98 M-$350 M-$415 M-$1,376 M-$2,178 M

CBIL vs CSAV exposure

Countries

CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon

Sectors

CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon

Diversification

CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
CSAV
Exposure data will be available soon

Characteristics

Compare
CBIL
CSAV
ProviderGlobal XCI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassFixed IncomeFixed Income
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.41%2.27%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 12, 2023June 18, 2019

Frequently asked questions about CBIL and CSAV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CBIL or CSAV?
As of April 24, 2026, CBIL has returned 0.66% year to date, while CSAV has returned 0.64%. CBIL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CBIL or CSAV?
As of April 24, 2026, CBIL manages $2.22 B in assets, while CSAV manages $4.88 B. CSAV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CBIL and CSAV managed?
CBIL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. CSAV is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CBIL or CSAV?
Year to date, CBIL has seen +$631.67 M in net flows, compared with -$415.18 M for CSAV. CBIL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CBIL and CSAV compare?
CBIL has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while CSAV has an expense ratio of 0.15%.

Recent articles about CBIL and CSAV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds