VS
When evaluating costs, CBIL features a management fee (MER) of 0.1%, compared to 0.28% for ZMMK. Performance-wise, CBIL has returned 0.66% year-to-date with +$632 M in net flows, whereas ZMMK is at 0.72% with +$171 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CBIL
ZMMK
| AuM | $2,223.88 M | $5,854.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.10% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.11% | 0.13% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBIL | +0.18% | +0.51% | +0.66% | +2.38% | +8.23% |
ZMMK | +0.20% | +0.56% | +0.72% | +2.56% | +12.34% | |
| Flows | CBIL | +$88 M | +$529 M | +$632 M | +$538 M | +$2,177 M |
ZMMK | +$384 M | +$254 M | +$171 M | +$1,170 M | +$5,341 M |
CBIL vs ZMMK exposure
Countries
CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CBIL
Exposure data will be available soon
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CBIL and ZMMK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CBIL or ZMMK?
As of April 24, 2026, CBIL has returned 0.66% year to date, while ZMMK has returned 0.72%. ZMMK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CBIL or ZMMK?
As of April 24, 2026, CBIL manages $2.22 B in assets, while ZMMK manages $5.85 B. ZMMK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CBIL and ZMMK managed?
CBIL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZMMK is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CBIL or ZMMK?
Year to date, CBIL has seen +$631.67 M in net flows, compared with +$170.92 M for ZMMK. CBIL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CBIL and ZMMK compare?
CBIL has an expense ratio of 0.11%, while ZMMK has an expense ratio of 0.13%.
Recent articles about CBIL and ZMMK
High Interest Cash ETFs: All You Need to Know Heading Into 2024
Interest in these ETFs has persisted throughout 2023 amid a "higher for longer" interest rate environment.
Posted on 12/11/2023 by Jean-Charles Senant inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.