CCCB
CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF

Full CCCB fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CCCB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, while HBNK leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CCCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CCCB has returned 26.72% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 30.59% with -$519 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCCB
-0.60%+14.76%+26.72%--
HBNK
-0.42%+16.60%+30.59%+64.73%+143.67%
Flows
CCCB
+$1 M+$2 M+$4 M--
HBNK
-$77 M-$62 M-$519 M-$839 M-$66 M

CCCB vs HBNK exposure

Countries

CCCB
Canada
99.86%
HBNK
Canada
99.94%

Sectors

CCCB
Finance
99.86%
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of July 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCCB
Bank of Montreal
16.86%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.71%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
National Bank of Canada
16.47%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.26%
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%

Diversification

CCCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.86%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%

Characteristics

Compare
CCCB
HBNK
ProviderCIBCGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.58%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 25, 2025July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CCCB and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCCB or HBNK?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB has returned 26.72% year to date, while HBNK has returned 30.59%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCCB or HBNK?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB manages $9.00 M in assets, while HBNK manages $719.17 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCCB and HBNK managed?
CCCB is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CCCB and HBNK emphasize?
CCCB is most exposed to Finance. HBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCCB or HBNK?
Year to date, CCCB has seen +$4.08 M in net flows, compared with -$519.23 M for HBNK. CCCB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCCB and HBNK compare?
CCCB has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of CCCB and HBNK?
CCCB's largest holdings include Bank of Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. HBNK's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCCB or HBNK?
CCCB holds 6 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, CCCB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CCCB and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds