VS
CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CCCB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CCCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CCCB has returned 26.72% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 30.51% with +$33 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CCCB
ZEB
| AuM | $9.00 M | $6,973.30 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.35% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.65% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCCB | -0.60% | +14.76% | +26.72% | - | - |
ZEB | -0.44% | +16.59% | +30.51% | +64.53% | +142.57% | |
| Flows | CCCB | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | - | - |
ZEB | +$626 M | +$930 M | +$33 M | +$333 M | -$774 M |
CCCB vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CCCB
Canada
99.86%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CCCB
Finance
99.86%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of July 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CCCB
Bank of Montreal
16.86%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.71%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
National Bank of Canada
16.47%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.26%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%
Diversification
CCCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.86%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CCCB
ZEB
| Provider | CIBC | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 25, 2025 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CCCB and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCCB or ZEB?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB has returned 26.72% year to date, while ZEB has returned 30.51%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCCB or ZEB?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB manages $9.00 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.97 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCCB and ZEB managed?
CCCB is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CCCB and ZEB emphasize?
CCCB is most exposed to Finance. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCCB or ZEB?
Year to date, CCCB has seen +$4.08 M in net flows, compared with +$32.79 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCCB and ZEB compare?
CCCB has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CCCB and ZEB?
CCCB's largest holdings include Bank of Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. ZEB's top holdings include The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Royal Bank of Canada, and Bank of Montreal.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCCB or ZEB?
CCCB holds 6 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CCCB is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CCCB and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.