CCDC
CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full CCDC fund page
VS
CRQ
iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF

Full CRQ fund page

CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (CCDC) and iShares Canadian Fundamental Index ETF (CRQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CCDC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while CRQ leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, CCDC features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for CRQ. Performance-wise, CCDC has returned 14.37% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas CRQ is at 17.49% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCDC
+3.50%+9.43%+14.37%--
CRQ
+3.41%+12.33%+17.49%+43.43%+102.91%
Flows
CCDC
+$2 M+$7 M+$11 M--
CRQ
-$2 M+$2 M+$10 M+$7 M-$8 M

CCDC vs CRQ exposure

Countries

CCDC
Canada
93.95%
CRQ
Canada
99.80%

Sectors

CCDC
Financials
37.44%
Energy
21.10%
Materials
9.50%
Industrials
8.05%
Other
7.87%
Other
16.04%
CRQ
Financials
41.62%
Energy
23.53%
Other
9.40%
Materials
8.19%
Other
17.25%
As of June 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCDC
ROYAL BK CANADA
8.28%
BANK OF MONTREAL
6.91%
TORONTO DOMINION
6.86%
ENBRIDGE
5.65%
BNS
5.05%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.64%
MANULIFE-S
4.63%
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
4.09%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.68%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.65%
CRQ
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.94%
TORONTO DOMINION
7.60%
ENBRIDGE
5.73%
BNS
5.33%
BANK OF MONTREAL
4.39%
SUNCOR ENERGY
4.19%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.07%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
3.79%
MANULIFE-S
3.19%
CA11271J1075
3.17%

Diversification

CCDC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
53.43%
CRQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 101 total
49.40%

Characteristics

Compare
CCDC
CRQ
ProviderCIBCiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-1.87%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 25, 2025February 22, 2006

Frequently asked questions about CCDC and CRQ

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCDC or CRQ?
As of June 18, 2026, CCDC has returned 14.37% year to date, while CRQ has returned 17.49%. CRQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCDC or CRQ?
As of June 18, 2026, CCDC manages $21.45 M in assets, while CRQ manages $146.05 M. CRQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCDC and CRQ managed?
CCDC is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. CRQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the FTSE RAFI Canada Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CCDC and CRQ emphasize?
CCDC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. CRQ is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCDC or CRQ?
Year to date, CCDC has seen +$11.40 M in net flows, compared with +$10.17 M for CRQ. CCDC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCDC and CRQ compare?
CCDC has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while CRQ has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CCDC and CRQ?
CCDC's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, BANK OF MONTREAL, and TORONTO DOMINION. CRQ's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCDC or CRQ?
CCDC holds 28 securities, while CRQ holds 90. On holdings count, CRQ is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds