CCDC
CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full CCDC fund page
VS
ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page

CIBC Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (CCDC) and BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CCDC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while ZWC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, CCDC features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.65% for ZWC. Performance-wise, CCDC has returned 14.47% year-to-date with +$11 M in net flows, whereas ZWC is at 12.48% with +$217 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCDC
+3.59%+7.94%+14.47%--
ZWC
+2.36%+5.78%+12.48%+29.51%+63.32%
Flows
CCDC
+$2 M+$7 M+$11 M--
ZWC
+$40 M+$134 M+$217 M+$291 M+$229 M

CCDC vs ZWC exposure

Countries

CCDC
Canada
93.95%
ZWC
Canada
98.39%

Sectors

CCDC
Financials
37.44%
Energy
21.10%
Materials
9.50%
Industrials
8.05%
Other
7.87%
Other
16.04%
ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCDC
ROYAL BK CANADA
8.28%
BANK OF MONTREAL
6.91%
TORONTO DOMINION
6.86%
ENBRIDGE
5.65%
BNS
5.05%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.64%
MANULIFE-S
4.63%
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY
4.09%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.68%
INTACT FINANCIAL
3.65%
ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%

Diversification

CCDC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
53.43%
ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%

Characteristics

Compare
CCDC
ZWC
ProviderCIBCBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-5.57%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 25, 2025February 9, 2017

Frequently asked questions about CCDC and ZWC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCDC or ZWC?
As of June 17, 2026, CCDC has returned 14.47% year to date, while ZWC has returned 12.48%. CCDC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCDC or ZWC?
As of June 17, 2026, CCDC manages $21.48 M in assets, while ZWC manages $2.35 B. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCDC and ZWC managed?
CCDC is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CCDC and ZWC emphasize?
CCDC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCDC or ZWC?
Year to date, CCDC has seen +$11.40 M in net flows, compared with +$216.62 M for ZWC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCDC and ZWC compare?
CCDC has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CCDC and ZWC?
CCDC's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, BANK OF MONTREAL, and TORONTO DOMINION. ZWC's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCDC or ZWC?
CCDC holds 28 securities, while ZWC holds 34. On holdings count, ZWC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CCDC and ZWC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds