CCLN
CIBC Clean Energy Index ETF

Full CCLN fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

Compare CIBC Clean Energy Index ETF (CCLN) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF (HBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CCLN provides Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while HBNK is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, CCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, CCLN has returned 11.16% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 13.38% with -$445 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20246810%Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCLN
+6.98%+5.48%+11.16%+60.22%-9.51%
HBNK
+8.75%+10.98%+13.38%+63.47%-
Flows
CCLN
+$0 M+$0 M+$1 M+$0 M+$0 M
HBNK
-$203 M-$380 M-$445 M-$701 M-

CCLN vs HBNK exposure

Countries

CCLN
USA
74.03%
Other
10.76%
Canada
9.28%
HBNK
Canada
99.99%

Sectors

CCLN
Utilities
23.86%
Industrials
21.51%
Information Technology
13.70%
Other
13.19%
Consumer Discretionary
10.80%
Other
16.95%
HBNK
Financials
99.99%
As of May 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCLN
ALBEMARLE
5.12%
NORTHLAND POWER
4.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
4.97%
FIRST SOLAR
4.82%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
4.78%
HNN ARMSTRNG S/D
4.73%
ITRON
4.54%
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE
4.52%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
4.35%
ENPHASE ENERGY
4.34%
HBNK
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.11%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.89%
BNS
16.66%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.52%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.47%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.34%

Diversification

CCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
47.15%
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.99%

Characteristics

Compare
CCLN
HBNK
ProviderCIBCGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.93%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateNovember 16, 2021July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CCLN and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCLN or HBNK?
As of May 5, 2026, CCLN has returned 11.16% year to date, while HBNK has returned 13.38%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCLN or HBNK?
As of May 5, 2026, CCLN manages $1.91 M in assets, while HBNK manages $688.12 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCLN and HBNK managed?
CCLN is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CCLN and HBNK emphasize?
CCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology. HBNK is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCLN or HBNK?
Year to date, CCLN has seen +$0.97 M in net flows, compared with -$445.21 M for HBNK. CCLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCLN and HBNK compare?
CCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of CCLN and HBNK?
CCLN's largest holdings include ALBEMARLE, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS. HBNK's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCLN or HBNK?
CCLN holds 34 securities, while HBNK holds 6. On holdings count, CCLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CCLN and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds