CCLN
CIBC Clean Energy Index ETF

Full CCLN fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Compare CIBC Clean Energy Index ETF (CCLN) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CCLN provides Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology exposures, while ZEB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, CCLN features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CCLN has returned 11.16% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 13.33% with -$1,114 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-20246810%Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27May 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 5, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCLN
+6.98%+5.48%+11.16%+60.22%-9.51%
ZEB
+8.76%+10.94%+13.33%+63.23%+117.91%
Flows
CCLN
+$0 M+$0 M+$1 M+$0 M+$0 M
ZEB
-$403 M-$987 M-$1,114 M-$1,769 M-$1,596 M

CCLN vs ZEB exposure

Countries

CCLN
USA
74.03%
Other
10.76%
Canada
9.28%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CCLN
Utilities
23.86%
Industrials
21.51%
Information Technology
13.70%
Other
13.19%
Consumer Discretionary
10.80%
Other
16.95%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 5, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCLN
ALBEMARLE
5.12%
NORTHLAND POWER
4.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
4.97%
FIRST SOLAR
4.82%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES
4.78%
HNN ARMSTRNG S/D
4.73%
ITRON
4.54%
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE
4.52%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
4.35%
ENPHASE ENERGY
4.34%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%

Diversification

CCLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 34 total
47.15%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CCLN
ZEB
ProviderCIBCBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.66%
Meets ESG criteriaYesNo
Inception DateNovember 16, 2021October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about CCLN and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCLN or ZEB?
As of May 5, 2026, CCLN has returned 11.16% year to date, while ZEB has returned 13.33%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCLN or ZEB?
As of May 5, 2026, CCLN manages $1.91 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.08 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCLN and ZEB managed?
CCLN is passively managed by CIBC. It tracks the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Select Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CCLN and ZEB emphasize?
CCLN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Information Technology. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCLN or ZEB?
Year to date, CCLN has seen +$0.97 M in net flows, compared with -$1,113.95 M for ZEB. CCLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCLN and ZEB compare?
CCLN has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CCLN and ZEB?
CCLN's largest holdings include ALBEMARLE, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCLN or ZEB?
CCLN holds 34 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CCLN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CCLN and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds