CCLO
CIBC Income Advantage Fund

Full CCLO fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

When evaluating costs, CCLO features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, CCLO has returned 0.5% year-to-date with -$37 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 15.32% with -$60 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.0%Mar 30Apr 7Apr 14Apr 21Apr 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCLO
-0.05%+0.17%+0.50%--
ZUT
-0.63%+12.47%+15.32%+28.73%+38.60%
Flows
CCLO
-$3 M-$23 M-$37 M--
ZUT
+$25 M-$37 M-$60 M+$129 M+$254 M

CCLO vs ZUT exposure

Countries

CCLO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%

Sectors

CCLO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of April 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCLO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%

Diversification

CCLO
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%

Characteristics

Compare
CCLO
ZUT
ProviderCIBCBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-2.91%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 21, 2025January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about CCLO and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCLO or ZUT?
As of April 30, 2026, CCLO has returned 0.50% year to date, while ZUT has returned 15.32%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCLO or ZUT?
As of April 30, 2026, CCLO manages $48.52 M in assets, while ZUT manages $873.00 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCLO and ZUT managed?
CCLO is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCLO or ZUT?
Year to date, CCLO has seen -$36.51 M in net flows, compared with -$60.16 M for ZUT. CCLO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCLO and ZUT compare?
CCLO has an expense ratio of 0.30%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.

Recent articles about CCLO and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds