CCNS
CIBC Conservative Fixed Income Pool ETF

Full CCNS fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, CCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, CCNS has returned 1.43% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 12.12% with +$452 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.0-0.50.00.51.01.5%Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 28, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCNS
-0.40%+0.83%+1.43%+3.74%+15.57%
ZSP
-0.76%+7.54%+12.12%+20.57%+78.36%
Flows
CCNS
+$0 M+$1 M+$2 M+$0 M+$6 M
ZSP
-$49 M+$158 M+$452 M+$1,165 M+$5,261 M

CCNS vs ZSP exposure

Countries

CCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.59%

Sectors

CCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.24%
Finance
13.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.96%
Healthcare
8.87%
Industrials
7.90%
Other
15.69%
As of July 28, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.48%
Microsoft Corp.
4.29%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.68%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Broadcom Inc.
2.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.60%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.94%
Tesla, Inc.
1.81%

Diversification

CCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.20%

Characteristics

Compare
CCNS
ZSP
ProviderCIBCBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassFixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield3.91%0.77%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 29, 2020November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about CCNS and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCNS or ZSP?
As of July 28, 2026, CCNS has returned 1.43% year to date, while ZSP has returned 12.12%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCNS or ZSP?
As of July 28, 2026, CCNS manages $7.23 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.02 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCNS and ZSP managed?
CCNS is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCNS or ZSP?
Year to date, CCNS has seen +$1.81 M in net flows, compared with +$452.05 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCNS and ZSP compare?
CCNS has an expense ratio of 0.44%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about CCNS and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds