VS
When evaluating costs, CCOM features a management fee (MER) of 0.52%, compared to 0.28% for HEWB. Performance-wise, CCOM has returned 21.04% year-to-date with +$181 M in net flows, whereas HEWB is at 33.33% with +$32 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CCOM
HEWB
| AuM | $393.91 M | $357.13 M |
| Management Fees | 0.52% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.74% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCOM | +2.37% | +8.31% | +21.04% | +26.51% | +27.97% |
HEWB | +4.23% | +2.54% | +33.33% | +50.31% | +164.81% | |
| Flows | CCOM | +$37 M | +$51 M | +$181 M | +$214 M | +$241 M |
HEWB | +$6 M | +$13 M | +$32 M | +$31 M | +$39 M |
CCOM vs HEWB exposure
Countries
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
HEWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CCOM
HEWB
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.47% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 22, 2022 | January 23, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CCOM and HEWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCOM or HEWB?
As of September 21, 2026, CCOM has returned 21.04% year to date, while HEWB has returned 33.33%. HEWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCOM or HEWB?
As of September 21, 2026, CCOM manages $393.91 M in assets, while HEWB manages $357.13 M. CCOM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCOM and HEWB managed?
CCOM is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USD benchmark. HEWB is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCOM or HEWB?
Year to date, CCOM has seen +$181.40 M in net flows, compared with +$32.44 M for HEWB. CCOM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCOM and HEWB compare?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while HEWB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about CCOM and HEWB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.