VS
When evaluating costs, CCOM features a management fee (MER) of 0.52%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, CCOM has returned 11.64% year-to-date with +$126 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 10.34% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CCOM
XIC
| AuM | $328.26 M | $29,994.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.52% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.11% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCOM | -5.68% | -0.65% | +11.64% | +17.98% | +17.62% |
XIC | +1.77% | +5.27% | +10.34% | +33.79% | +89.23% | |
| Flows | CCOM | +$2 M | +$77 M | +$126 M | +$170 M | +$206 M |
XIC | +$408 M | +$2,783 M | +$5,643 M | +$7,720 M | +$11,682 M |
CCOM vs XIC exposure
Countries
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
99.06%
Sectors
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
29.96%
Energy
17.73%
Materials
14.57%
Other
13.30%
Other
24.44%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.02%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.05%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.16%
ENBRIDGE
3.38%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.00%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.89%
CA11271J1075
2.78%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
2.78%
BNS
2.68%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
2.63%
Diversification
CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
36.37%
Characteristics
Compare
CCOM
XIC
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Commodity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.54% | 2.03% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 22, 2022 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CCOM and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCOM or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, CCOM has returned 11.64% year to date, while XIC has returned 10.34%. CCOM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCOM or XIC?
As of June 11, 2026, CCOM manages $328.26 M in assets, while XIC manages $29.99 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCOM and XIC managed?
CCOM is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCOM or XIC?
Year to date, CCOM has seen +$126.18 M in net flows, compared with +$5,643.19 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCOM and XIC compare?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about CCOM and XIC
Natural Gas ETFs React to Price Surge
Natural gas prices hit two-year highs as cold weather, record LNG exports, and supply disruptions tighten market conditions.
Posted on 2/24/2025 by ETF Market Canada inOil & Gas
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.