CCOM
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund

Full CCOM fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, CCOM features a management fee (MER) of 0.52%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, CCOM has returned 11.64% year-to-date with +$126 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.3% with +$566 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCOM
-5.68%-0.65%+11.64%+17.98%+17.62%
ZSP
+1.90%+12.40%+10.30%+26.61%+83.75%
Flows
CCOM
+$2 M+$77 M+$126 M+$170 M+$206 M
ZSP
+$89 M+$283 M+$566 M+$1,532 M+$5,079 M

CCOM vs ZSP exposure

Countries

CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%

Sectors

CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%

Diversification

CCOM
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%

Characteristics

Compare
CCOM
ZSP
ProviderCIBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkAuspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USDS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCommodityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield7.54%0.76%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 22, 2022November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about CCOM and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCOM or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, CCOM has returned 11.64% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.30%. CCOM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCOM or ZSP?
As of June 11, 2026, CCOM manages $328.26 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.78 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCOM and ZSP managed?
CCOM is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCOM or ZSP?
Year to date, CCOM has seen +$126.18 M in net flows, compared with +$565.61 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCOM and ZSP compare?
CCOM has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about CCOM and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds