CEQY
CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF

Full CEQY fund page
VS
CEQT
CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF

Full CEQT fund page

Compare CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF (CEQY) vs CI Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CEQT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CEQY provides Technology, Finance, and Industrials exposures, while CEQT is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CEQY features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.22% for CEQT. Performance-wise, CEQY has returned 16.54% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas CEQT is at 15.33% with +$25 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.5%Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 6Oct 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CEQY
+2.30%+2.23%+16.54%+17.50%-
CEQT
+0.77%+1.48%+15.33%+17.63%+85.29%
Flows
CEQY
+$1 M+$4 M+$8 M+$8 M-
CEQT
+$2 M+$4 M+$25 M+$31 M+$45 M

CEQY vs CEQT exposure

Countries

CEQY
USA
44.83%
Canada
26.39%
Other
28.79%
CEQT
USA
37.13%
Canada
29.63%
Other
33.24%

Sectors

CEQY
Technology
26.22%
Finance
24.05%
Industrials
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.21%
Energy
7.26%
Other
25.12%
CEQT
Finance
25.63%
Technology
24.24%
Industrials
9.57%
Non-Energy Materials
9.51%
Energy
7.55%
Other
23.49%
As of October 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CEQY
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
2.45%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.72%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.36%
Shopify, Inc.
1.32%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.07%
CEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
2.69%
Apple, Inc.
2.37%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.30%
Microsoft Corp.
1.95%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.61%
Shopify, Inc.
1.40%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.34%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.31%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.04%
Bank of Montreal
0.98%

Diversification

CEQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,262 total
19.28%
CEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,778 total
17.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CEQY
CEQT
ProviderCIBCCI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.07%1.36%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 25, 2025May 17, 2023

Frequently asked questions about CEQY and CEQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CEQY or CEQT?
As of October 15, 2026, CEQY has returned 16.54% year to date, while CEQT has returned 15.33%. CEQY is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CEQY or CEQT?
As of October 15, 2026, CEQY manages $10.11 M in assets, while CEQT manages $56.17 M. CEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CEQY and CEQT managed?
CEQY is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. CEQT is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CEQY and CEQT emphasize?
CEQY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. CEQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CEQY or CEQT?
Year to date, CEQY has seen +$8.19 M in net flows, compared with +$24.74 M for CEQT. CEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CEQY and CEQT compare?
CEQY has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while CEQT has an expense ratio of 0.30%.
What are the top holdings of CEQY and CEQT?
CEQY's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. CEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: CEQY or CEQT?
CEQY holds 6145 securities, while CEQT holds 6670. On holdings count, CEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds