VS
CIBC All-Equity ETF Portfolio ETF (CEQY) and CI ONE Global Equity ETF (ONEQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CEQY focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Industrials, while ONEQ leans towards Technology, Finance, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CEQY features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.85% for ONEQ. Performance-wise, CEQY has returned 15.65% year-to-date with +$8 M in net flows, whereas ONEQ is at 18.4% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CEQY
ONEQ
| AuM | $10.03 M | $58.56 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.85% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.95% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEQY | +1.49% | +2.02% | +15.65% | +16.91% | - |
ONEQ | +1.23% | +2.15% | +18.40% | +22.20% | +82.94% | |
| Flows | CEQY | +$1 M | +$4 M | +$8 M | +$8 M | - |
ONEQ | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | -$16 M |
CEQY vs ONEQ exposure
Countries
CEQY
USA
44.83%
Canada
26.39%
Other
28.79%
ONEQ
USA
44.58%
Canada
31.28%
Other
24.14%
Sectors
CEQY
Technology
26.22%
Finance
24.05%
Industrials
9.14%
Non-Energy Materials
8.21%
Energy
7.26%
Other
25.12%
ONEQ
Technology
33.94%
Finance
18.31%
Energy
9.80%
Industrials
7.95%
Other
30.00%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CEQY
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Microsoft Corp.
2.45%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.72%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.36%
Shopify, Inc.
1.32%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.07%
ONEQ
NVIDIA Corp.
9.52%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
3.90%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
3.28%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.24%
Loblaw Cos. Ltd.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.61%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.34%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.11%
ASML Holding NV
1.92%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.88%
Diversification
CEQY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6,262 total
19.28%
ONEQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,962 total
33.53%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CEQY and ONEQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CEQY or ONEQ?
As of October 16, 2026, CEQY has returned 15.65% year to date, while ONEQ has returned 18.40%. ONEQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CEQY or ONEQ?
As of October 16, 2026, CEQY manages $10.03 M in assets, while ONEQ manages $58.56 M. ONEQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CEQY and ONEQ managed?
CEQY is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ONEQ is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CEQY and ONEQ emphasize?
CEQY is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials. ONEQ is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CEQY or ONEQ?
Year to date, CEQY has seen +$8.19 M in net flows, compared with -$0.08 M for ONEQ. CEQY has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CEQY and ONEQ compare?
CEQY has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.95%.
What are the top holdings of CEQY and ONEQ?
CEQY's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. ONEQ's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., and Suncor Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CEQY or ONEQ?
CEQY holds 6145 securities, while ONEQ holds 7848. On holdings count, ONEQ is the more diversified portfolio.
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.